Scientific studies to prove whether magnetic water treatment is effective in treating hard water are both time consuming and costly. Accordingly, most studies accomplished by institutions like the
School of Water Sciences and independent universities, are funded by private parties who have particular questions they want answered. Study sponsors normally have an agenda and financial objective
and have complete control over study results and how they are reported. Thus, what is reported corresponds to the economic interests of the sponsors paying for the studies. What you see in the
studies is what the sponsors want reported, nothing more. For example, if the study objective is to determine how and why magnetic water treatment works, but publication of those results is not in
the economic interests of the sponsors, the information becomes proprietary and is not published. None of the studies I've reviewed (except for the Polish study and a few others) are ever
conclusive one way or the other. For example, published scientific reports and published articles coming out of Baylor and Crain field Universities have a decidedly negative tone but always
conclude with some half way positive statement such as "well, we really don't know why it works". It seems that keeping this technology on the fringe of acceptability, promotes the financial
interests of parties wishing to either control the spread of the technology or control the entry of independent practitioners wishing to participate in the marketing of the technology.
About 80% of water exists as water molecule clusters and are held together by hydrogen bonds. The molecular agitation from the .